An IBM i cloud migration is mostly hosting, project labor, and licensing checks, not application rework. Plan by component and on a three-year total cost of ownership.
Because IBM i lifts and shifts onto cloud Power largely as-is, the cost of an IBM i migration is dominated by IBM i cloud hosting options (or capacity), the migration project itself, and software licensing, not by rewriting applications. As with any migration, budget by component and on a three-year TCO rather than the project alone.
| Category | Cloud Power (PowerVS) | Hosted / managed Power |
|---|---|---|
| Platform / hosting | $80k–$600k+/yr | Bundled in service fee |
| Migration labor | $50k–$250k | $40k–$200k |
| IBM i + ISV licensing | Portability check | Portability check |
| Backup / DR | Add-on | Often bundled |
Ranges are illustrative and for planning orientation only, your actual numbers depend on core counts, capacity, data volumes, and contract terms. We size them precisely in an assessment.
Mostly hosting or capacity, the migration project labor, and license portability, not application rework, because IBM i lifts and shifts onto cloud Power largely as-is.
Both, on a three-year total cost of ownership. The one-time migration project is only part of it; the hosting or consumption cost over time usually dominates the picture.
Yes, the usual ones are IBM i and ISV license portability checks, data replication for large libraries, private connectivity, HA/DR reconfiguration, and contractor augmentation for scarce IBM i skills.
PowerVS bills by consumption while you staff operations; managed Power bundles operations into a fee. Which is cheaper depends on your team and utilization, so it's worth modeling both before deciding.
Real figures depend on your estate, but the shape repeats. Two representative cost pictures.
Situation. A single Power9 IBM i system, modest growth, and an internal admin retiring.
Approach. Managed Power cloud, bundling hosting, operations, and DR into one monthly figure.
Outcome. Capex for a refresh avoided; three-year TCO landed close to managed hosting once the retiring-admin labor was counted.
Situation. IBM i production plus a DR mandate that on-prem couldn't meet affordably.
Approach. PowerVS for production with cloud Power DR, sized to defined RTO/RPO.
Outcome. A higher run-rate than hardware alone, but lower three-year TCO once a second site and its staffing were priced in.
Representative scenarios reflect common IBM Power migration patterns and typical ranges, not specific named client engagements.
A credible IBM i migration number starts with your own inputs. Pull these together and any estimate, ours or a provider's, gets sharper.
We'll size your hosting, labor, and licensing against your actual LPARs and a three-year TCO.
Free and no obligation. Response within one business day.